The real reason Joe Exotic got into the zoo business

Joe Exotic, Carole Baskin, and Doc Antle.  These names are everywhere nowadays, along with the rest of the characters in Netflix’s hottest docuseries, Tiger King: Murder, Mayhem and Madness. While some stars are a little more villainous and eccentric than others, every cast member is captivating in their own right, especially where it concerns Joe. For instance, how did the Kansas native become the owner of Oklahoma’s Greater Wynnewood Exotic Animal Park? And when did he first become entranced by exotic zoo animals? 

As it turns out, Joe — who is serving a 22-year sentence for wildlife violations and a murder-for-hire plot — first became interested in animals thanks to his brother, Garold Schreibvogel, according to Texas Monthly. Garold once supposedly “confided in Joe that he hoped one day to live in the wild in Africa so he could see the beautiful beasts there running free.”

After high school, Joe worked as a police officer and became the chief when he was just 19, per Texas Monthly. Around this time, one of Joe’s siblings informed their parents that he was gay and, in response, their father shook Joe’s hand and made him promise he wouldn’t attend his funeral. Understandably, this experience was devastating to Joe and he allegedly tried to drive his police cruiser off of a bridge. Joe was left with severe injuries and moved from the family’s home in Texas to West Palm Beach, Fla., to recover.

What happened next? Stay with us to find out.

It all started with Pet Safari

While recovering in Florida, Joe Exotic became close to his neighbor, a man named Tim, who owned a pet store. Tim had a friend who worked at a drive-through zoo, and this friend would occasionally bring home baby animals, allowing Joe to play with baby monkeys and lions, according to New York Magazine. Joe said “he was broken and those little critters helped put him back together,” according to the outlet.

A few years later, in Texas, Joe and his brother, Garold Schreibvogel, bought a pet store called Pet Safari. Joe and his brother started with “reptiles, birds, and small fish” but gradually got more unusual animals, like armadillos, according to Texas Monthly.

Sadly, just as the store was gaining traction, Garold was hit by a drunk driver outside of Dallas and died in October 1997, according to Texas Monthly. Joe’s family won $140,000 in a lawsuit over Garold’s death, and Joe convinced his parents to spend the money on a memorial zoo. So Joe bought an old horse farm in Wynnewood, Okla. and dubbed it: The Garold Wayne Exotic Animal Memorial Park.

Joe Exotic finally gets his tigers

Joe Exotic only had a deer and a buffalo, belonging to his brother, Garold Schreibvogel, to feature at the G.W. Zoo when it first opened, according to Texas Monthly. But when word spread that there was an exotic animal park, people started dropping off animals they could no longer take care of. First came a mountain lion, then a bear, followed in 2000 by two tigers who had been abandoned in a backyard. These two tigers bred, and Joe and his husband at the time, Brian Rhyne, raised the cubs in their living room, just like the zookeeper had done back in Texas. More and more people dropped off their exotic animals until Joe had a packed zoo.

Amazingly, Joe wasn’t initially interested in breeding tigers, according to New York Magazine, because he knew that they were “mean” and expensive to feed when fully grown. However, he quickly realized that tiger cubs, and the fees involved with petting them, could offset the growing costs of the zoo. 

So this became his financial plan until, as New York Magazine noted, Joe became “the largest breeder of tigers in the country.” But this financial solution soon proved tricky, and the rest, as they say, is history.

Source: Read Full Article

The reason Harry and Meghan aren’t fazed by Trump’s security cost claims

Meghan Markle and Prince Harry reportedly moved to Los Angeles from Canada in March 2020, a development that inspired a very pointed tweet from President Donald Trump about the cost of their security. “It was reported that Harry and Meghan, who left the Kingdom, would reside permanently in Canada. Now they have left Canada for the U.S. however, the U.S. will not pay for their security protection,” he tweeted. “They must pay!”

Although it’s not the most welcoming tweet ever, some might argue Trump raised a fair point. With Meghan and Harry stepping down as members of the royal family on March 31, 2020, as their spokesperson confirmed, the cost of their security must fall to someone, and no political leader is necessarily obligated to shoulder the financial burden.

Had they remained working members of the royal family, the Home Office, part of Her Majesty’s Government, would have covered their security bill, but since the couple has chosen to step down, that’s no longer the United Kingdom’s responsibility, according to the Sovereign Grant Act. And when Meghan and Harry moved to Canada, the Royal Canadian Mounted Police provided protection, a service that ended March 31, according to CBC News.

Despite all the drama surrounding the situation, Harry and Meghan aren’t fazed by Trump’s security cost claims due to a very logical reason.

Did Trump cause drama for nothing?

The Duke and Duchess of Sussex probably aren’t bothered by President Donald Trump’s tweet because they have the funds to cover their security costs, and this dough will likely come from their sizable net worths. Meghan Markle, for instance, is reportedly worth $5 million thanks to her acting career and other projects, while Prince Harry supposedly has $25 million in the bank. Not only does the dad benefit from a trust Princess Diana set up, but he also earned money during his time in the army, according to the Daily Mail. The Queen also left an inheritance and some of her jewels to the royal, and it’s rumored Prince Charles will provide the couple “private financial support” for a year, per People

These figures appear to back up a statement from the couple’s rep regarding Trump’s security claim, which makes this whole drama seem very silly. “The Duke and Duchess of Sussex have no plans to ask the U.S. government for security resources,” they told Fox News. “Privately funded security arrangements have been made.”

Your move, Trump.

Reactions to Trump's tweet were mixed

It’s fair to argue Meghan Markle and Prince Harry have been plagued by negativity ever since 2016 when they became a couple. President Donald Trump’s recent tweet and the subsequent comments to his claim revealed that, sadly, little has changed.

“The same Meghan [Markle] that said she would leave the US if Trump was elected is the same girl that now wants our President Trump to sign off on making the taxpayers pay for her security bill?” one person tweeted. “Bye girl.” Someone else commented, “Mr. President is right The US should NOT have to pay for these freeloaders. Well done!!”

However, there isn’t any public evidence that the Duke and Duchess of Sussex planned on asking for support. It’s also reasonable to point out the odd timing of Trump’s ire, as one person noted on Twitter, “Trump tweeting about Meghan Markle and her husband like we’re not in a pandemic?? Like what??” Another fan chimed in, “You’re welcome in California.”

The final word on this spat? We don’t think it will be resolved anytime soon.

Meghan Markle and Prince Harry are too busy for nonsense

Although the Duke and Duchess of Sussex have money of their own, their cost of living will be very expensive, especially where it concerns private security. It’s possible “day-to-day security for a year could cost $1 million,” including “$570,000 for residential security, $245,000 for a driver, and $150,000 for an advance agent,” per Town & CountryHowever, CBC News estimates the cost of their private security could be anywhere between “$10 to $30 million a year.” Yikes! Of course, those figures are based on speculation.

Security costs aside, it’s clear the couple will be busy with their various projects. Together, the Duke and Duchess of Sussex will “launch a non-profit organization for their charitable activities in areas including youth empowerment, mental health, conservation, gender equality, and education,” while “Harry will also continue to oversee the Invictus Games, the Olympics-style competition he founded for wounded troops,” as TIME noted. Markle also has a new job with Disney, working as the narrator for the documentary Elephant. 

Translation: It’s an exciting new chapter for Meghan and Harry, and it’s probably safe to say they’re too busy to be fazed by President Donald Trump’s nonsense. 

Source: Read Full Article

The Reason Why You Should Never Remove Your Lash Extensions At Home

Unless you were lucky enough to coincidentally have a lash extension appointment just before spas and salons started closing down, you’re probably getting close to the point where you’re noticing some sparseness—and wanting to take matters into your own hands. So let’s add this to the very long list of things we never thought we’d have to wonder about: Since you can’t get them filled, is there a way to remove your own lash extensions while stuck at home?



The short answer: No. Please don’t. Clementina Richardson, celebrity eyelash expert and founder of Envious Lashes in New York City, explains that unfortunately, there are no over-the-counter products or DIY hacks that can safely break down the adhesive to remove your own lash extensions. Attempting to remove them yourself can pull-out your actual lashes (since the extensions are attached strand by strand), damage the follicle, and can lead to bald spots that may never grow back.

So what can you do? Well for starters, have a little patience. Your extensions will eventually shed with your natural lash cycle (which shouldn’t be more than a few weeks), notes Richardson. Second, you can make sure to really nourish and strengthen your natural lashes, so that they’re as long, lush, and healthy as possible once the extensions have all shed away. This will also give you a strong foundation to apply new lash extensions onto in the future.

Here’s how Richardson recommends caring for your natural lashes:

Keep Your Lashes Conditioned

Add a lash serum to your nighttime skincare routine, if you’re not using one already. The evening is best so that you aren’t layering the serum under mascara, plus the hair-strengthening ingredients can penetrate while you sleep. Try Envious Lashes Luxuriating Lash Conditioning Serum or GrandeLASH MD Lash Enhancing Serum.

Avoid Eyelash Curlers

Richardson advises against mechanical eyelash curlers because they can damage your natural lashes by pulling the lashes out at the root or breaking them in half. If you prefer a lifted look, try a washable mascara with a curling formula and rounded bristles like Maybelline The Falsies Lash Lift Mascara.

Never Sleep in Makeup

This is especially important to remember when you’re wearing less makeup than usual. If you only applied a touch of mascara and concealer, it can be tempting to skip your typical nighttime cleansing routine. But aside from it damaging your skin, eye makeup build-up can weaken your natural lashes. To keep them healthy and clean: Use an eye makeup remover (Glossier Milky Oil sweeps away even waterproof with no rubbing or tugging), then gently cleanse the rest of your face.

Source: Read Full Article

The real reason Meghan Markle and Harry are in a better place with the royal family

If family members are willing to work through their differences and see things from each other’s perspectives, most issues can be overcome — that seems to apply to the royals in Britain, as well. The monarchy was thrown into turmoil when Prince Harry and Meghan Markle announced in January 2020 that they were stepping back from their official roles and duties. While the situation appeared to be quite dire for a while — and included a possible punishment as well as an awkward encounter — the family now seems to be focused on trying to move forward.

“Things are in a better space now between the couple and the royal family,” according to a source who opened up to Entertainment Tonight on March 23, 2020. “While of course there have been tensions, the family is getting through it.”

This is surely a good thing for Harry who was reportedly having a hard time leaving his family and may have been suffering in the aftermath of Megxit. These days, he’s likely feeling pretty darn great if he’s adjusting to his new life as well as his wife seems to be.

Meghan Markle has 'never been happier' and it's easy to understand why

Although Prince Harry and Meghan Markle faced a bumpy road when they decided to change up their royal roles, it looks like their tough decision is already paying off. Not only is the situation with the rest of the family apparently smoothing over, but a source told Us Weekly that “Meghan feels free. She has never been happier. She’s happy to be out of London.”

That’s understandable considering the “British tabloids were ruthless to Meghan Markle,” per Global News. The former actress, who has experience in the spotlight, admitted during an ITV documentary (via People) that while she was warned before marrying Harry that “the British tabloids [would] destroy [her] life, she explained: “I never thought that this would be easy, but I thought it would be fair.” It certainly didn’t seem to be fair at all if you take a look at just how differently Markle and Middleton are treated by the press. 

While this makes it quite clear why the Duchess of Sussex would want to leave England ASAP, the US Weekly insider also acknowledged that Markle “was surprised at how quickly everything happened.” That may be the case, but judging by her joy-filled final appearances in Britain with her husband at the beginning of March 2020, these two are definitely ready to begin a new life together with their son, Archie, in their Canadian home. 

And honestly, who wouldn’t be thrilled to live in a $14 million mansion on the water with their very own prince charming?

Source: Read Full Article

The real reason Andy Cohen won’t release Real Housewives episodes early

Talk show host Andy Cohen, who serves as an executive producer of the Real Housewives franchise, talked about the effects of the coronavirus on his Bravo reality series. Talking to Sirius XM’s Reality Checked with Amy Phillips, Cohen revealed that fans have been begging him to drop The Real Housewives of New York and The Real Housewives of Beverly Hills early because so many folks are staying home and would love the entertainment. Why won’t Cohen give us something new to binge-watch during this time of crisis? 

The explanation is practical. Cohen said that “there are only a certain amount of episodes that are totally color-corrected and locked right now, for both of those shows.” He added that another reason he can’t rush the release is because the team is still working on plans to enable people to edit the shows remotely. In this case, working from home will also take longer. “If we released all [the episodes] now, we would wind up screwing ourselves in the end, so that’s the issue,” he said. “…I just think we need to be focused.”

Cohen also has a serious problem of his own to contend with.

Andy Cohen tests positive for the coronavirus

While production for the Real Housewives franchise is slowing because of the coronavirus, Andy Cohen has also learned that he’s tested positive for the illness. Cohen shared his diagnosis on Instagram: “After a few days of self-quarantine, and not feeling great, I have tested positive for Coronavirus.” He added, “As much as I felt like I could push through whatever I was feeling to do [Watch What Happens Live] from home, we’re putting a pin in that for now so I can focus on getting better. I want to thank all the medical professionals who are working tirelessly for all of us, and urge everybody to stay home and take care of themselves.” 

Cohen is among a growing list of celebrities who’ve tested positive for COVID-19, so it’s become clear that every facet of the entertainment industry is feeling the effects of illness, social-distancing, and an economic slowdown. Though avid fans are missing the drama of the Real Housewives, we can all agree that Andy Cohen’s health and safety is the priority. 

Source: Read Full Article

The Real Reason Why Naomi Campbell Wore a Hazmat Suit Through LAX

Naomi Campbell is one of the most famous models in the world. She rose to fame in the 1980s and 1990s, and soon became a supermodel who was recognizable even to people who did not know much about fashion.

Campbell recently made headlines when she wore a hazmat suit through LAX. Given the situation surrounding COVID-19 in the world right now, it is understandable that many people want to take safety measures when flying. However, wearing a full-on hazmat suit is still largely unheard of, so Campbell decided to share her reasoning behind her unique outfit.

Naomi Campbell admits that she was ‘nervous’ about flying

After sharing pictures of herself in a hazmat suit at LAX, Campbell posted a video to her YouTube channel called “Protecting Myself Against Coronavirus.” In the video, Campbell gave fans a detailed look into the preparations for her flight from Los Angeles to New York City.

“As this is a very sensitive time in the world, I’m not going to lie to you and say I’m not nervous to take this flight…I am,” Campbell told viewers.

In order to ease her nerves, Campbell could be seen getting ear seeds applied to her acupuncture points, which helps to “balance the heart and mind.” Then, Campbell put on a hazmat suit that she bought from Amazon for $15.99. She paired that with pink latex gloves so that she could limit her contact with surfaces as much as possible.

“In all honesty, this is not a funny time. It’s not a humorous time,” Campbell stated. “I’m not doing this for laughs. This is how I feel comfortable traveling.”

Campbell also shared that some people on the plane moved away from her, but it did not bother her. The 49-year-old said: “Everybody didn’t want to be around me but that’s cool — I didn’t want to be around them either.”

People reported that, although this is the first time that Campbell wore a hazmat suit while flying, she has actually been wearing gloves and masks on flights for a long time now to protect herself against germs on surfaces around the airport and airplane.

Naomi Campbell has previously shared a video about her ‘airport routine’

This is also not the first time that fans got to see Campbell going to extreme measures to protect her health. Last year, the model posted a video that shared with fans her “airport routine.”

In the video, she revealed that she wipes down every surface around her on the plane, including her seat belt, tray table, TV screen, remote control, and window. She also has a cover that she puts over the seat before sitting on it.

The routine takes quite a while to do, but Campbell believes that this has helped her stay healthy over the years. She said: “As much as I travel, I should get sick so much more with colds and stuff. I’m blessed that I don’t. I really think that this helps me, my little routine.”

How other celebrities have been dealing with the coronavirus outbreak

Campbell is not the only celebrity who is making sure that they stay safe during the coronavirus outbreak.

For example, Howie Mandel has also been spotted in a hazmat suit of his own. Meanwhile, stars like Gwyneth Paltrow, Selena Gomez, and Brody Jenner have started wearing face masks.

Other celebrities like Katie Couric and Celine Dion are taking precautions and staying home to help contain the spread of the coronavirus. Tom Hanks and his wife, Rita Wilson, have both tested positive for it, so they are being put in isolation.

Source: Read Full Article

The reason you should use castile soap for your acne

Do you have a collection of cleansers claiming to diminish acne, or maybe a strict regimen of face treatments, but your pimples seem to be invincible? We’ve all been there, and with all the different products and companies offering cures to the red bumps on our faces, it’s harder than ever to know what to do. It seems like it might be time to go back to the basics with castile soap.

The bad news is that many anti-acne products are filled with skin irritants and toxins, but the good news is that there’s a simple alternative. Castile soap is a non-toxic, oil-based product that’s traditionally been crafted out of olive oil, but it can be made with hemp, avocado (for folks who didn’t get their avo toast fill), and coconut oils. It’s also earth-friendly and biodegradable. The natural product lathers up just like your chemical-filled soaps, but without the drawbacks (via Era Organics).

People have been using the stuff for thousands of years, so it’s got to be good right? It’s even worthy of a queen: Cleopatra apparently experienced a similar issue that we face today, and demanded a better cleansing product. In response, the Egyptians made her an early version of castile soap.

Castile soap can help sooth acne

Acne can be irritated by products with extreme pH levels. Our skin likes to have a pH of about 5.5, meaning it’s slightly acidic, but many cleansers totally throw that off (via Skin Care Rx). Castile soap is often considered a fairly neutral product on the pH scale, and is able to help balance the acidity in many skin types with its slight alkalinity. However, some castile products have been reported to leave skin feeling tight and dry leading to an overproduction of oil throughout the day (via Bustle). As with any product, it’s always safest to proceed with caution and act according to how your skin responds. 

It can be tricky to find the right castile soap, but beware of products claiming to be natural while still including chemicals in their cleanser. A cult favorite of many oil-based soap fans is Dr. Bronners. It’s organic and easy to find, plus it has a whopping 18 uses, from laundry detergent to deodorant (via Best Advisor). If Dr. Bronners isn’t doing it for you, Kirk’s Original Hypoallergenic Castile soap might do the trick. It’s gentle enough for babies, and has been sold for almost a century as a non-toxic product. It’s definitely another great option for acne prone skin.

If your acne isn’t responding to common skincare options, an oil-based castile soap just might do the trick.

Source: Read Full Article

Revealed, the real reason for ball-boys… to make Chelsea’s 23-stone, 6ft 4ins goalkeeper look even bigger between the sticks

NOWADAYS ball-boys in football are commonplace… integral even.

Youngsters, often youth team players, are tasked with fetching the ball after it's left the field of play to keep the game moving smoothly.

But, incredibly, ball-boys were NOT even invented to retrieve footballs.

To learn the real origin of the humble ball-boy, you need to take a trip down memory lane – all the way to 1905, in fact.

In the late-19th and early-20th century, there stood a man known as "The Colossus" – 6ft 4ins, 23-stone William Foulke.

Despite his incredible size, Foulke – affectionately known as "Fatty Foulkes" – was a goalkeeper… and a very good one at that.

After joining Chelsea from Sheffield United for an incredible fee of just £50 – having spent 21 years at the Blades – the Blues had an idea.

How could they make their gigantic goalie look even more massive? Perspective, of course.

In order to make the man-mountain look even more imposing, they hired two young boys to stand behind the goal, in a bid to make him appear yet more humongous.

And boy did it work… having joined newly-formed Chelsea, one-cap England international Foulke was handed the maximum wage and was instantly installed as club captain.

In his one and only season in London, the giant stopper saved TEN penalties as the Blues finished third in the Second Division.



Despite his incredible size – weighing just one pound less than his two full-backs combined – Foulke was agile, athletic and deemed to be one of the first 'keepers to punch incoming crosses clear.

In 1905-06, Foulke conceded just 28 goals in 35 games… which is all the more impressive when you consider Chelsea shipped 17 in the SIX matches he missed.

Source: Read Full Article

The real reason Dolly Parton and Kenny Rogers never dated

It was a match made in country music heaven, but duet partners Dolly Parton and Kenny Rogers somehow never became a couple in real life. Their lifelong friendship contributed massively to the chart success of many classic hits, but their indelible chemistry both on record and when sharing the stage together never managed to spill over.

Now, over 30 years after they first teamed up, we finally know the answer to why the Parton-Rogers dream team remained just in the recording studio, on the airwaves, and in our hearts.

The country music titans were about to take the stage together for the final time when Today cornered them for a chat about what went wrong romantically for them. “First of all, she’s hard to look at for me,” Rogers joked cheekily, with Parton responding, “I’m not his type.” Ever since 1983’s massive “Islands in the Stream,” fans have been rooting for the two to make it official, but Rogers explained they made better music by keeping things friendly. “I’m a believer that tension is better if you keep it than if you satisfy it,” Rogers explained.

Rogers joked that Parton had turned him down, but Dolly quickly shut that down, saying, “Nah. You know what, we were almost like brother and sister. And it would almost be like incest. So we just never went there. The “Jolene” hit-maker confirmed the two are very good friends and super similar, maybe even a bit too similar at times, which is why they never crossed that line.

Country music will honor Dolly Parton and Kenny Rogers once again

Both Parton and Rogers will be celebrated in upcoming TV specials, due for release on A&E this spring. According to Sounds Like Nashville, the legendary stars will be honored alongside fellow icon Willie Nelson. First up, on April 12, Biography: Dolly looks to tell the singer’s life story from growing up in poverty in Tennessee to her recent 50th anniversary celebration at the legendary Grand Ole Opry. Parton herself will be interviewed for the special, which will surely detail how she changed country music.

Rogers will get similar treatment when Biography: Kenny Rogers airs the following night. The doc will tell his similarly fascinating life story, also integrating footage from the singer’s 2017 farewell concert, All In For The Gambler. Naturally, his lifelong friend Parton will feature as one of the interviewees discussing the musician’s undeniable impact on country music. 

Source: Read Full Article

The reason Prince Harry is collaborating with Jon Bon Jovi

Prince Harry may no longer be employed as a member of Team Windsor, but that doesn’t mean he’s just sitting around twiddling his thumbs, if he even knows how to do this. (Does anybody?) Nor did Harry need to take Burger King up on their generous offer for him to become the paper-crowned Burger Prince. Instead, his post-royal career has him rocking out with the Crown Prince of New Jersey (Bruce Springsteen being the undisputed king as well as The Boss) Rock and Roll Hall of Famer Jon Bon Jovi. The two of them got together not just for fun — though it certainly seemed to be just that — but to collaborate on a project that will benefit disabled veterans of Her Majesty’s Armed Forces.

Jon Bon Jovi have Prince Harry a new nickname

The rocker and the royal got together at Abbey Road Studio to record a single with the Invictus Games Choir, which is, according to an Instagram teaser clip released to promote the song, “made up of made up of wounded, injured and sick veterans and serving personnel from all services and different ranks of the UK Armed Forces com[ing] together to use the power of music to aid their recovery.” Proceeds from the sales of the single will benefit the Invictus Games, a sporting event for disabled service members that was founded by Prince Harry in 2014. The single itself, Bon Jovi says, was written to honor veterans who struggle to overcome PTSD and acknowledges their strength and that of the entire Armed Forces community.

While Harry did not actually lend his voice to “Unbroken,” he did pose with Jon and a few choir members in a recreation of the Beatles’ famous Abbey Road album cover photo. Oh, and he also earned a new nickname: according to the BBC, Bon Jovi jokingly referred to Harry as “the artist formerly known as prince.”

Source: Read Full Article